| 
       
 
 Some type of
      secondary interaction between an analyte and the column causes peak
      tailing. This interaction is in addition to the partitioning behavior
      seen for reversed-phase analyses. Peak tailing is most commonly seen with
      basic compounds and is usually a result of interactions between the
      residual silanols and positively charged basic compounds. The most common
      of these interactions is an ion exchange interaction between a positively
      charged basic compound and a negatively charged column surface silanol.
      Silanols on the surface of silica-based columns will have a negative
      charge when the pH of the mobile phase is above 4.5 – 5.0. Therefore the
      quickest way to reduce peak tailing is to operate with a buffered mobile
      phase at a pH below 4. Choosing newer columns with high purity, fully
      hydroxylated silica will also minimize peak tailing because silanol
      activity and ionization is reduced. 
        
      
  
       
  
       
       
            Some ZORBAX columns that use this type of silica are
      the StableBond columns, the Eclipse XDB columns, the Bonus-RP and the
      Extend-C18 column. Each of these columns can reduce peak tailing, but
      they are all a little different. The StableBond (SB) columns are ideal at
      low pH so they are often first choices to reduce peak tailing when using
      a low pH mobile phase. The Eclipse XDB columns are the first choice to
      reduce peak tailing if your mobile phase is pH 5 – 9. This column is
      double endcapped so it minimizes peak tailing by covering as many
      residual silanols on the column surface as possible and eliminating
      possible secondary interactions with silanols. The Bonus-RP column is
      also a good choice to reduce peak tailing in this intermediate pH region.
      The Bonus-RP column has a bonded-phase with an imbedded polar group. This
      group reduces interactions between basic compounds and residual silanols
      thereby improving the peak shape of basic compounds. This column can be
      used from pH 2 – 8. The Extend-C18 is designed as a high pH column and
      can be used up to pH 11.5. At high pH many basic compounds are no longer
      charged and interactions with silanols are minimized, reducing peak
      tailing. 
       
            Careful choice of a
      mobile phase can also reduce peak tailing. Buffered mobile phases (25 –
      50 mM) will reduce peak tailing and low pH mobile phases are preferred
      (pH 2 –3). This should also result in more reproducible chromatography.
      Mobile phase additives such as triethylamine (TEA) can be added
      to reduce peak tailing of basic compounds, if needed. TEA acts
      as a competing base and ties up silanol sites, eliminating interactions
      between your analyte and residual silanols. But this type of additive is
      rarely needed at low pH and is only occasionally necessary at
      intermediate pH. 
       
             If you have peak tailing with an acidic
      compound the same process applies. Reduce the mobile phase pH to try to
      protonate the acids, then use a buffered mobile phase and try increasing
      the ionic strength of the mobile phase. Finally a competing organic acid
      can be added to the mobile phase and we have achieved excellent results
      with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and this additive has a very low UV
      cutoff. Following these suggestions should reduce peak tailing of acids
      and bases. 
       
        
         
      Most columns now use spherical particles because columns packed with
      spherical particles will have higher efficiencies. Therefore start by
      choosing a column with spherical particles. The most common particle size
      choice for analytical separations is 5 um because it is easy to use, but
      more often today the better choice is 3.5 um particles. These smaller
      particles generate higher efficiencies in shorter column lengths and make
      it possible to do separations with shorter analysis times. If analysis
      time is important to you, consider choosing a ZORBAX Rapid Resolution
      (3.5 um) column to minimize analysis time. The 4.6 x 150 mm, 3.5 um Rapid
      Resolution column will have the same efficiency as a 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 um
      column and reduce analysis time by 40%. Other shorter Rapid Resolution
      columns (75 mm, 50 mm, 30 mm, and 15 mm) are available to further reduce
      analysis time. 
       
            Column pore size is selected based on the molecular
      weights of your analytes. A pore size of less than 100Å can be used for
      small molecules with molecular weights less than 4000. Larger molecules,
      such as proteins and peptides, should be analyzed on 300Å pore size
      columns. In addition, some smaller molecules with large, multi-ring,
      rigid structures can better be analyzed on 300Å pore size columns.
      Choosing the right pore size is important because most of the
      bonded-phase resides in the pores of the particles, therefore optimum
      retention and peak width are achieved only if the molecules can diffuse
      in and out of the pores rapidly and easily.- 
       | 
     
     
No comments:
Post a Comment